Blog
The Gelatine Sculpt Blog
Four long reads behind the Gelatine Sculpt label, and all four start from the same document: a Supplement Facts panel that names 23 substances and prints one amount. The first derives what the 200 mg blend still lets you work out, and where the arithmetic fails. The second reads the seller’s six-ingredient graphic against the panel’s 23. The third runs the four published doses against this label’s ceilings. The fourth is about the phrase not published and what each absence closes off. Every source is a US government page you can open yourself.
By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk · Last updated September 24, 2026
All posts
Four posts, and what each one is for
Each one answers a single narrow question in full rather than four questions in outline. They are written to be useful whether or not you ever buy anything, and every one of them was last updated on September 24, 2026.
September 24, 2026 · The blend
What a proprietary blend actually tells you, and what it does not
The descending-order rule in 21 CFR 101.36(c)(2), the 200 divided by n ceiling worked through on this blend, and the four things it cannot tell you.
1,842 words · By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk
September 24, 2026 · Six of 23
Six of twenty-three: reading an advert against its own label
The seller's ingredient graphic shows six substances. The panel on the bottle names twenty-three. What the other seventeen are, and what that does not prove.
1,798 words · By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk
September 24, 2026 · Checking a dose
How to check a dose when the label never gave you one
Four ingredients here have a dose published by NIH. Each one run against this label's ceilings, including the one whose studied dose did nothing.
1,860 words · By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk
September 24, 2026 · Not published
What not published means on a supplement label
Standardisation, caffeine totals, dropper volumes, dates and certificates: the absences on this label, and the check each one closes off for a reader.
1,823 words · By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk
In more detail
What you will find inside each one
The blend post, 1,842 words
The two sentences of 21 CFR 101.36(c)(2) and (c)(3) quoted in full, then the ceiling derivation in three checkable steps and all 22 of this blend’s maximums drawn to scale. Most of the post is the other half of the method: why a ceiling has no floor under it, why the 22 of them cannot be added together, why an unstandardised extract cannot be converted into an active compound, and why the first ingredient’s ceiling of 200 mg is the blend total restated rather than a finding.
The six-of-23 post, 1,798 words
Two documents out of one folder, counted against each other: 23 substances on the panel, 6 on the seller’s ingredient graphic, 17 in the difference. The six are tabulated with their positions and ceilings, the 17 are listed in the panel’s own order, and the four ingredients our sources attach safety language to are quoted, three of which are in the omitted group. Then three things the finding does not prove, and the five-step method as a procedure for any product.
The dose post, 1,860 words
African mango against a 300 mg daily dose that is larger than the whole blend. Coleus forskohlii against a 500 mg dose that NIH reports had no effect on body weight, which is why a bigger number would not have rescued it. Green tea and capsicum, where the published range is a marker compound and the ceiling is raw extract, so the comparison stops one step short. And chromium, the one printed amount, read with NIH’s own verdict on the trials rather than without it.
The absences post, 1,823 words
Five values this label does not publish, each with the check it removes: standardisation and every dose comparison, the caffeine total and the daily sum, the dropper volume and the difference between 60 days and 30, the best-before date and a shelf-life check, the certificate reference and the document it is not. Then three further absences, a table of published figures with nothing on this label to hold them against, and the four questions worth putting to the order desk before you buy.
Where to start
Six reasons someone opens this page, and the post for each
| What you are asking | Where to start | The post |
|---|---|---|
| You want to know how much of an ingredient is in a serving | Start with the blend post | What A Proprietary Blend Actually Tells You |
| You saw an ingredient in an advert and want to check it | Start with the six-of-23 post | Six Of Twenty-Three: An Advert Against A Label |
| You want to compare this with a dose you read about | Start with the dose post | How To Check A Dose You Were Not Given |
| You take prescription medicine and want the safety lines | Start with the six-of-23 post | Six Of Twenty-Three: An Advert Against A Label |
| You are working out what a day of this costs | Start with the absences post | What Not Published Means On A Supplement Label |
| You want to know what a certificate reference is worth | Start with the absences post | What Not Published Means On A Supplement Label |
House rules
How these posts are written
Every product fact is read off the panel and the supplier pack
The 1 ml serving, the 60 servings a bottle, the 200 mg blend total, the 23 substance names, lot GEL-26/GO-3092 and certificate reference GEL-3092-26-GO all come from the supplied artwork and the supplier pack. Where the label is silent these posts write not published and list the gap.
A ceiling is never printed as an amount
A ceiling is the most an ingredient could possibly be. It is never the amount in the bottle, and the real weight may be a small fraction of it. Every figure of that kind on this site carries at most, no more than or cannot exceed in front of it, and the one post that derives them spends half its length on what they cannot tell you.
The label wins where the documents disagree
The panel and the seller’s marketing disagree in this pack about the spelling of a species, about how many ingredients there are and about the word natural. The label artwork supplied with this stock is legible and we have transcribed it rather than paraphrasing it, misspellings included. The panel prints 'Maintin' for Maintain, 'mevenii' for meyenii, 'gabonesis' for gabonensis and 'Typtophan' for Tryptophan. We leave those as they are printed, because a site that silently corrects a label is no longer quoting it.
Only seven external sources are cited
Two NIH fact sheets, three NCCIH pages, one FDA consumer page and the text of 21 CFR 101.36. All seven were opened and read on September 24, 2026, and each post lists the ones it uses. No published trial on the finished Gelatine Sculpt formula appears in anything we have read, so every source on this site describes a single ingredient or the product category rather than this bottle.
No reviews, no ratings, no order counts
The review material supplied with this stock is marked in the supplier pack as layout copy, which means placeholders rather than customers. So no post here quotes a testimonial, a score or a number of orders, and the reviews page explains that in full.
Looking for the product pages instead?
The blog is background reading. The panel is transcribed line by line on the label page, the 23 substances are taken one at a time on the ingredients page, the cautions are on the cautions page, the packs and the cost of a day are on the pricing page, the window is on the guarantee page, and what the lot and certificate references are worth is on the testing and quality page.
This page indexes four posts. The footer of every page links the rest of the site, and the label page is the shortest route to the document all four of these posts are a different view of.
The line that sits above all of it
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The panel names 23 substances and prints one amount, 0.7 mcg of chromium. Twenty-two of the twenty-three substances on this label have no weight against their name. They sit inside a proprietary blend declared as one figure, 200 mg for all of them together, which 21 CFR 101.36(c) permits. Four ingredients have a dose published in the sources we opened and every ceiling falls below it, and on one of those four the studied dose produced no effect on body weight.
A ceiling is the most an ingredient could possibly be. It is never the amount in the bottle, and the real weight may be a small fraction of it. No published trial on the finished Gelatine Sculpt formula appears in anything we have read, so every source on this site describes a single ingredient or the product category rather than this bottle.
Keep reading
Next on this site
What a proprietary blend actually tells you, and what it does not
The descending-order rule in 21 CFR 101.36(c)(2), the 200 divided by n ceiling worked through on this blend, and the four things it cannot tell you.
How to check a dose when the label never gave you one
Four ingredients here have a dose published by NIH. Each one run against this label's ceilings, including the one whose studied dose did nothing.
What not published means on a supplement label
Standardisation, caffeine totals, dropper volumes, dates and certificates: the absences on this label, and the check each one closes off for a reader.