USA authorized retailer. Call .
Claims
Gelatine Sculpt is made to support healthy digestion, nutrient absorption and a healthy metabolism.
Those two support lines are printed on the bottle. The seller's marketing adds three more, including appetite and energy, and this page explains each one.
See what is inside on the ingredients page.
By the Gelatine Sculpt Editorial Desk · Last updated September 24, 2026
The claims
What it supports
The seller’s support panel and the bottle front do not carry the same list. That difference is visible in the artwork itself, and it is worth knowing before you buy rather than after.
On the bottle · asterisked
Printed on the bottle front, misspelling included, and repeated correctly in the seller’s panel. The asterisk ties it to the FDA disclaimer. It is a structure and function claim: it says the product supports a process, not that it produces a result.
On the bottle · asterisked
The second of the two lines the bottle carries. Also asterisked. Neither of the two names a condition, a timeframe or an amount, and neither is required to.
Marketing only · no asterisk
Not on the bottle. No asterisk back to the FDA disclaimer on the panel that carries it. It states an outcome rather than support for a process, and nothing in this pack quantifies it.
Marketing only · no asterisk
Not on the bottle, and no asterisk. Two ingredients on the label carry caffeine, guarana and green tea, and no total caffeine figure is printed anywhere, so the one obvious route to an energy claim is the one the label does not quantify.
Marketing only · no asterisk
Not on the bottle, and no asterisk. The amino acids in the blend all sit from position 14 downward, so none can exceed 14.3 mg at its ceiling, and amino acids are usually studied in grams rather than milligrams.
Two patterns run through those five. The two on the bottle are hedged: they say helps maintain and supports. The three that are not on the bottle state an outcome: appetite reduced, energy boosted, lean muscle gained. And the two hedged lines carry the asterisk while the three outcome lines do not.
On the bottle
The asterisked pair
Those are the two lines printed on the bottle front, in rounded pills with small icons, exactly as the artwork prints them. The first misspells Maintain as Maintin and we have left it that way.
Each ends in an asterisk. The asterisk points at the FDA disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Marketing only
The three extra lines
None of these three appears on the bottle. None of them carries an asterisk back to the disclaimer printed along the foot of the same graphic. We are not the regulator and the panel is not our document to police. The narrow, checkable point is that a reader who buys because of one of these three has bought on a line the bottle does not carry.
Two ingredients on this label carry caffeine: guarana at position 3 and green tea at position 7. NIH gives guarana as “3%-6% caffeine” and NCCIH notes that “No safety concerns have been reported for green tea consumed as a beverage by adults. However, green tea does contain caffeine.” No total caffeine figure is printed on this bottle, so the one plausible route to an energy claim is also the one figure the label withholds. The cautions page
Claim and evidence
A claim is not a finding
A permitted form of words
A structure and function claim describes a role a nutrient or ingredient plays in a normal body process. It is not reviewed by the FDA before the product goes on sale, and any product carrying one must also carry the disclaimer. The presence of such a line on a bottle tells you what the seller has chosen to say. It tells you nothing about whether the bottle does it.
A trial on this formula
No published trial on the finished Gelatine Sculpt formula was supplied with this stock and none appears in any source we opened. Every reference on this site describes a single named ingredient, not this bottle. What exists instead is a set of single-ingredient findings, and on this label the published doses sit above the ceilings. African mango was trialled at “150 mg IGOB131 or placebo 30-60 minutes before lunch and dinner (300 mg total daily dose) for 10 weeks”. Coleus forskohlii at “500 mg standardized for 10% forskolin”, where “Coleus forskohlii extract had no effect on body weight”.
The one printed amount, in context
The panel prints 0.7 mcg. NIH records that “doses of chromium picolinate were 200 to 1,000 mcg/day”. Before that gap becomes an argument in either direction, NIH’s own verdict on those trials is worth reading in full:
Research suggests that supplementation with chromium, mainly in the form chromium picolinate, reduces body weight and body fat percentage to a very small, but statistically significant, extent. However, these effects have little clinical significance.
So the honest reading is not that a larger number would have worked. It is that the one number on this label sits far below a dose that already did very little.
Not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Not printed
Four things that arrived looking like evidence
A page about benefits is judged as much by what it declines to print as by what it prints. Four assets came in this pack that would have supported those five lines if they had been what they look like.
A score, a written count, an order count, a recommend rate and eight named customers. The supplier pack marks all of it as layout copy only, in its own words, and four of the eight entries repeat each other’s sentences verbatim. Layout copy is filler used to size a page before the real thing arrives.
No doctor is named anywhere in the pack, and the bottle in her hands is labelled LIPO SCULPT, which is a different product. It is a stock endorsement image for something else.
No article, author, date or DOI was supplied for any of the five. Five trademarks in a row with nothing behind them read as an endorsement that nobody has given.
No account, date or link came with them, so there is no way to check that any of them exists.
Publishing any of that as customer opinion would mean inventing customers, so this site publishes no score, no order count and no testimonials, and marks none up in its structured data either.
The logo strip is the one that bears directly on this page. Five publication trademarks in a row, with no article, author, date or identifier behind any of them, read as an endorsement that nobody has given. Had one of them come with a citation, it would be quoted here and listed in the references at the foot of this page. None did.
Three bottles is $59 each with free US shipping, six is $49 each. The 60-day window is a purchase policy, not a promise about a result.
See the packs, from $49 a bottle
Order desk +1 (925) 231-0148 · opening hours not published
Questions
Every source above was opened and read on September 24, 2026. None of them tested Gelatine Sculpt itself. They describe the named ingredients and the product category, which is a different thing from testing this finished formula.
Every figure on this site comes off the Gelatine Sculpt panel or a source we opened and named. If the amount of something is the reason you are buying, the order desk is the only place that can answer it.